Battle of the Bulge: Retirement’s Next Challenge

By Patricia Pascuzzo

Changes announced in the federal budget take us a step forward in ensuring the superannuation system achieves what it was set up to do – provide greater security of income for people in retirement while reducing the burden on taxpayers of supporting retirees.

The budget this week promised a new retirement income framework which aims to boost living standards for retirees and expand the options available to them by requiring super fund trustees to offer new comprehensive income products.

A framework is needed because our defined contribution system asks individuals to manage financial risks beyond their capability. Despite the complexity involved, Australians have proved reluctant to pay for advice, a prospect that only looks unlikely to diminish in the near future given revelations at the Haynes Royal Commission.

The irony is retirees have never needed more help managing the heightened risks they face without the security of employment income.  These include unfavourable investment returns close to or in retirement (sequencing risk), outliving their savings (longevity risk), loss of purchasing power (inflation risk) and unexpected health and aged care needs (event risk).

Managing these risks involves complicated trade-offs that are highly specific to each member’s circumstances and preferences. Yet most are ill-equipped to do this. And the system is focussed on the accumulation of assets with little support during the drawdown phase.

Compulsory super and default funds were designed to overcome behavioural and other barriers that prevented people from saving.  But those biases do not suddenly self-correct when people reach retirement age. Having been in default vehicles throughout their working lives, there is little reason to expect people suddenly be able to switch on and navigate even more complex variables.

The answer is to develop our contributions-based system so that it delivers outcomes akin to a defined benefits framework designed around individual needs.  At a minimum, a mass-customised solution will take account of each member’s age, gender, health status and debt, while providing couples the option of a reversionary benefit.  To ensure income stability over retirement, the solution also should take into account pension entitlements.

Given limited access to financial advice, trustees will need improved products and a scalable process to guide or nudge members towards better retirement outcomes.  And to ensure members’ interests are served, super funds will have to make major investments in governance, people, systems and technology, including decision support systems.

It’s arguable that our intensely regulated industry, conceived via government mandate, lacks the required level of innovation, entrepreneurialism and vision to meet the needs of the bulge of baby boomers now entering retirement. So, again, there is a role for the government to facilitate market development and set the rules of the game.

The budget is a step in this direction. It means superannuation fund trustees will be required to consider the retirement income needs of their members and develop a strategy to help members achieve their retirement income objectives. Alongside the requirement to offer comprehensive income products, the government also announced new means testing rules that removes an important impediment to development of new income stream products to better manage longevity and sequencing risk.

The changes will have major implications for people planning for retirement and the super funds who serve their needs. Not only are such solutions needed for disengaged super fund members, they may also provide an escape route for self-managed fund trustees looking for a set-and-forget secure income stream that kicks in during their advanced years.

The CSRI Leadership Forum on 30-31 May 2018 will bring together leaders in public policy, industry and academia for detailed discussions about what these changes mean and how to take them forward.

For the nation, these changes represent a substantial, long-term investment in making our market work more effectively, making our retirement income system more sustainable and making the lives of millions of Australians better.

Patricia Pascuzzo is founder and executive director of the Committee for Sustainable Retirement Incomes, an independent, non-partisan and non-profit think tank.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s